summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server - nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> - 2012-05-18 1955.eml
blob: d880ee2c2826caa2baa0c69e15f89f84dbedf4c4 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
Delivered-To: ennael1@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.82.164 with SMTP id j4csp20161oay;
        Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.84.193 with SMTP id b1mr3752144wiz.11.1337363745012;
        Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org>
Received: from alamut.mageia.org (alamut.mageia.org. [212.85.158.146])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o5si12408459wee.1.2012.05.18.10.55.44;
        Fri, 18 May 2012 10:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.85.158.146;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org
Received: by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix, from userid 486)
	id 4960A44700; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CA044700
	for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mageia.org
Received: from alamut.mageia.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (alamut.mageia.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
	with ESMTP id ZiO1x8NxLp7y for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>;
	Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx1.mars-attacks.org (invaders.mars-attacks.org [88.191.83.84])
	by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E9D421D7
	for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx1.mars-attacks.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id AB7D2280874E; Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:55:39 +0200
From: nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
To: Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny@gmail.com>
Cc: board-private@ml.mageia.org
Message-ID: <20120518175539.GT21938@mars-attacks.org>
References: <CANa9xwtsY2iynMFMdhQjqxOfvd_aB0XqVKFX+HAB4iBtAwRhFA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANa9xwtsY2iynMFMdhQjqxOfvd_aB0XqVKFX+HAB4iBtAwRhFA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Subject: Re: [board-private] mandriva, foundation, business server
X-Loop: board-private@ml.mageia.org
X-Sequence: 52
Errors-to: board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org
Precedence: list
Precedence: bulk
Sender: board-private-request@ml.mageia.org
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <board-private.ml.mageia.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=subscribe%20board-private>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=unsubscribe%20board-private>
List-Post: <mailto:board-private@ml.mageia.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:board-private-request@ml.mageia.org>
List-Archive: <https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/board-private>

On Fri, 18 May 2012, Romain d'Alverny wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> so, Anne and me got in a conf call with JM Croset a few minutes ago to
> get a status.
> 
> He announced yesterday (Thursday, May 18)
> http://blog.mandriva.com/en/2012/05/17/mandriva-linux-will-return-to-the-community/
> . So several discussions are popping up here and there. Mageia's
> position has been transferred to some people inside Mandriva, among
> which Peroyvind (see
> https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?p=18041#p18041 - although
> he doesn't have the full story it seems).
> 
> He will announce early next Monday (22) that Mandriva SA will use
> Mageia as a tech platform for its business server line, and contribute
> back. Antoine Ginies (Mandriva engineer in chief for the business
> server) will get in touch with us to see how we do this technically.
> 
> He worries that trolls and discussions may damage Mageia in the coming
> days (for both news: Mandriva using Mageia as a tech platform for its
> Business Server line; and Mageia not following Mandriva in its
> foundation things) because he realizes that... community stuff
> sometimes goes out of hand; but he reassured us that, whatever is
> said, he does mean good for everyone; so it's important to play it
> cool and neutral on our side too.
> 
> So, here's a suggested plan:
> 
>  * we announce/explicit both news on our side on Monday early morning
> (CEST) as well, in a single blog post embedding all Mandriva-related
> news:
>    - on one side, Mageia is not going to join Mandriva foundation
> project (and why, cold reasons as we gave him),
>    - on the other side, Mandriva is going to use Mageia as tech
> platform for its business server line (link) and contribute back.
>    - this double news should make it more obvious that things are not
> so simple as "Mageia is dumping Mandriva" or "Mandriva is rebasing on
> Mageia".
> 
>  * this news being published Monday morning, it leaves two full days
> to propagate, before we push the Mageia 2 release news (Tuesday
> evening) - interest about Mageia will have raised a bit in the
> previous days, and this release news will hide partially the previous
> news.
> 
>  * until now, all this has been kept private in board-private: a)
> knowledge and decision about the foundation, and b) business server
> thing. Note that about a), people may question both the decision and
> the fact that it was private, without consulting the Council. We will
> mail privately Council members to inform them about both a) and b),
> but still. We won't need further arguments than what we explained to
> Mandriva, and what the governance says. But still again. In the case
> of things getting really ugly in the coming weeks, I'd suggest that we
> call for a vote of confidence to make things very clear (from Council,
> or from all registered contributors in LDAP).

This looks like a good plan.

I suggest starting the blog post on piratepad. Then sending a first
draft of the blog post tomorrow (or when we have something ready) to
council members to inform them about it and see what they think of it.